Do We Have to Talk About Pain to Heal?

The short answer is no.

But it isn't a simple no.

Talking matters, but it isn't the only way

Talking has helped a great many people make sense of what they lived through. When we tell our story to someone who listens honestly, scattered events begin to connect. We start to see why a small moment can set off a large fear, why we withdraw from a relationship we actually want, or why we carry guilt for something we could never have prevented.

Words give us meaning. They help us name an experience, place it in its own time, and tell the difference between what happened then and what is happening now.

But words do not work on their own, and pain does not grow lighter simply because we have described it. A person can tell the story dozens of times while the body goes on behaving as though the danger were still nearby. The mind may understand that the event is over, and still there is waking at night with a racing heart, or freezing at a tone of voice that resembles an older one.

And sometimes words become a wall standing between us and what we feel.

Some studies, for instance, found that writing about painful experiences did not ease trauma symptoms for every participant. This does not make writing useless, but it reminds us that getting the story out of us does not automatically turn into recovery. How we tell it, when we tell it, and whether we feel safe while telling it are all part of the therapy, not secondary details.

Danger sometimes reaches the body before it reaches thought

Imagine you are walking down the street and hear a loud crash behind you. Before you know where the sound came from, your body has already begun to respond: your heart speeds up, your muscles tighten, your attention turns toward the danger.

All of this happens quickly because the body does not wait for a full explanation before protecting you. It picks up sounds, smells, faces, and small shifts in a room, then compares them with what it has already learned about danger.

So your body may react today to something that reminds it of an old experience, even when you know with your mind that you are somewhere safe. The reminder might be a sound, a smell, someone stepping closer, or even a quiet that resembles the quiet before something painful happened.

Under intense stress, the brain directs its energy toward fast response and protection. Our capacity for calm thinking, for putting events in order, for finding the right words, narrows. Part of you is taken up with one question: "How do I survive this moment?" Meanwhile, someone in front of you is trying to ask, "How do you understand what is happening?" So the analysis lands like asking someone to explain the sound of an alarm at the very moment the sound is filling the room.

The body may know the story in a different way

We hold our experiences in more than one form. The mind keeps some of it as a story: where were we, who was with us, what happened first and what came after.

The body keeps another part differently. An experience can show up as a movement that stops before it finishes, as shoulders that rise on their own, as a constant urge to watch the door. It can settle into the habit of apologizing too quickly, into pulling back when someone comes close, into the sense that you have to stay ready at all times.

These responses can look strange from the outside, yet they made sense at the time they began. Perhaps you once needed to stay silent, or to watch other people's faces, or to make your body as small as possible. Your body learned that these were the things that kept you safe, and it went on using them long after the circumstances changed.

The trouble here is not that your body "failed to move on." It is still using the old map because it has not yet had enough tools and experiences to tell it that the terrain has changed, and that today it has choices that were not available before.

When therapy begins with a question: what do you feel right now?

Some therapeutic approaches have developed ways of starting from what is happening in the body, before entering the details of the story. Researchers sometimes call this route "bottom-up" processing, because the work begins with sensation and movement, then gradually reaches feeling and words.

The therapist may ask: what do you notice in your body right now?

Perhaps a pressure in your chest. Perhaps nothing at all but numbness. You might notice that your feet are not quite meeting the floor, or that your hands are clenched, or that your breathing has grown shorter since the conversation began.

The aim is not to interpret every sensation or to search for a hidden meaning behind it. The work begins with something simple and safe to notice: these are my feet on the floor. This chair is holding my weight. I am here in this room. I can look around and see the door, the window, the light.

Approaches such as Somatic Experiencing and the Trauma Resiliency Model use attention to sensation and movement to help a person regulate their feelings and reactions. They come toward the memory slowly, and generally avoid pushing a person to revisit the whole experience while they are submerged in it.

Coming close to pain in bearable doses

Some people try to face pain by entering it all at once. They believe that the more details they remember, the more they cry, the harder they push themselves to speak, the closer they are to the end of it.

But a body that has lived through drowning usually needs an experience unlike drowning.

It needs to come a little closer, then return to something steady. To touch a part of the ache, then notice the feet on the floor. To recall an image, then look around the room and confirm that the present is still here.

Think of someone going back into the sea after nearly drowning. Being thrown suddenly into deep water in order to "get over the fear" will not help. They might begin by standing near the shore, then letting the water touch their feet, stepping back when they need to, returning when their body feels able to hold it.

Is pain "stuck inside the body"?

The phrase is used often, but it can make it sound as though pain were a physical substance stored in the muscles and waiting to come out.

The picture is more precise than that.

After a difficult experience, the patterns of response the body learned keep on happening: tension, watchfulness, a quick startle, or numbness and disconnection. The nervous system responsible for protecting you becomes faster at switching the alarm on and slower at switching it off.

Movement, attention to sensation, conscious breathing, and a safe relationship with a therapist all help give the body new experiences. It learns, gradually, that it can feel tension without falling apart, that it can return to calm after arousal, and that it has more room today to move and to choose.

Some studies have found improvement in trauma symptoms among participants who received Somatic Experiencing, or a brief body-based intervention alongside their usual treatment. These results are encouraging, but they are best read as promising routes that may suit some people, not as a single answer that fits everyone.

We need safety before we need explanation

A person can know exactly why they are afraid, and the fear can still be there.

You can know that your current partner is not the person who hurt you before, and still your body tightens when they are slow to reply. You can understand that your manager is nothing like your father, and still find yourself thrown by any piece of feedback. You can tell yourself the war is far from your house tonight, while your body finds it hard to sleep.

Knowing matters, but it sometimes arrives at a closed door. The body needs to live safety first, time after time, before it can receive what the mind already knows.

That is why the real work can begin in a moment that looks undramatic: the therapist notices your face change and pauses, instead of pressing you to keep talking. They let you stay silent without treating the silence as resistance. They ask whether you want to come closer to the subject or leave it for another time. And you feel that you can say "that's enough" and the person in front of you stays close.

In moments like these, the body learns something new about relationship: I can be present, with my pain, without losing hold of what is happening to me.

Words heal when someone can hold them

This is not a sharp choice between talking and the body. Many therapies weave the two together, beginning with sensation and arriving at words, or beginning with the story and pausing to notice what the story is doing to the body.

Talking carries a real capacity to heal when it comes at a time that can be borne, and inside a relationship where a person feels heard. Words then help us take back ownership of our story, connect the scattered parts, and understand that our reactions did not appear out of nowhere.

And talking can become painful when it turns into a test: tell everything, explain everything, make your experience coherent and orderly enough that we believe you are in pain.

Some experiences come out first as a tear, a silence, a movement of the hand, a long breath out. The words arrive later, when the inside is able to receive them.

How do I know which way I need?

There may be a stage when you need to talk, and another when you need silence. Writing may help, or movement, or art, or prayer, or individual therapy, or being among a group that carries something of your experience.

The right way is the one that lets you come close to the pain without taking away your ability to choose. A way in which you feel present inside the experience, able to stop, to come back, to breathe, and to ask for support.

Recovery does not ask you to tell everything. A day may come when you want to talk, and you find that the words have grown nearer and quieter. And you may discover that some parts found their place through a safe relationship, or a movement, or a ritual, or a moment of crying that needed no explanation.

Pain has many languages.

Words are one of them, the body is one of them, silence is one of them, and the relationship that holds us when language fails may be the deepest of all.

References:

Andersen, T. E., Lahav, Y., Ellegaard, H., & Manniche, C. (2017). A randomized controlled trial of brief Somatic Experiencing for chronic low back pain and comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 8(1). DOI: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1331108.

Brom, D., Stokar, Y., Lawi, C., Nuriel-Porat, V., Ziv, Y., Lerner, K., & Ross, G. (2017). Somatic Experiencing for posttraumatic stress disorder: A randomized controlled outcome study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 30(3), 304-312. DOI: 10.1002/jts.22189.

de Kloet, E. R., de Kloet, S. F., de Kloet, C. S., & de Kloet, A. D. (2019). Top-down and bottom-up control of stress-coping. Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 31(3), e12675. DOI: 10.1111/jne.12675.

Grabbe, L., & Miller-Karas, E. (2018). The Trauma Resiliency Model: A “bottom-up” intervention for trauma psychotherapy. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 24(1), 76-84. DOI: 10.1177/1078390317745133.

Jackson, J. C., Jong, J., Bilkey, D., Whitehouse, H., Zollmann, S., McNaughton, C., & Halberstadt, J. (2018). Synchrony and physiological arousal increase cohesion and cooperation in large naturalistic groups. Scientific Reports, 8, 127. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18023-4.

Payne, P., Levine, P. A., & Crane-Godreau, M. A. (2015). Somatic Experiencing: Using interoception and proprioception as core elements of trauma therapy. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 93. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00093.

Sloan, D. M., Marx, B. P., Bovin, M. J., Feinstein, B. A., & Gallagher, M. W. (2012). Written exposure as an intervention for PTSD: A randomized clinical trial with motor vehicle accident survivors. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50(10), 627-635.

Sue, S., Zane, N., Nagayama Hall, G. C., & Berger, L. K. (2009). The case for cultural competency in psychotherapeutic interventions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 525-548. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163651.

Wendt, D. C., Gone, J. P., & Nagata, D. K. (2015). Potentially harmful therapy and multicultural counseling: Bridging two disciplinary discourses. The Counseling Psychologist, 43(3), 334-358. DOI: 10.1177/0011000014548280.
:::